Succession vs Arrested Development: The Series Engine

Succession vs Arrested Development: The Series Engine

This week we’re going to be talking about Succession. If you haven’t already seen the whole season, don’t worry. We aren’t going to give away any major spoilers.

What we’re going to be looking at this week is the structure of Succession: the way that this piece is actually put together and the way the season is created so that every single episode can feel completely different but also deliver the same emotional experience to its audience.

If you haven’t seen Succession, basically here’s the premise: What if Rupert Murdoch were King Lear?


That’s the structure of the piece. It’s looking at a modern day tycoon, a modern day king (in fact his last name is Roy, which means king). And this patriarch, Logan Roy, is sick and needs someone to take over the “throne”—to take over control of his company.

Like King Lear, he has some children.

Lear has three daughters; Logan Roy has four children. And he needs one of these children, or all of these children, to step up and take over the kingdom of his giant media empire.

And of course, the problem is that all of his children are spoiled and also hurt and broken. There’s nobody who’s actually ready to succeed him.

In many ways Succession is really a show about trust.

It’s a show about what happens when trust—between father and son, father and daughter, husband and wife—gets violated.

It’s about the kinds of choices people make in a world where they can’t trust each other—when the trust between corporations and people, between rich and poor, breaks down. It’s about what happens to our families, and what happens to our society.

And the painful thing about watching Succession is that, because nobody trusts anybody, no one can feel the love that actually exists.

All of these people are the product of a deeply dysfunctional family, run by a deeply dysfunctional patriarch, who of course has demons of his own and his own past that he’s wrestling with.

And what they do so beautifully in Succession is to fully dramatize these characters. Everybody in the show is awful. Everybody in this show is selfish, greedy. They’re the awful, entitled 1%—the worst possible version of those people. Everybody has some inner awfulness that they wreak upon the people around them.

And at the same time, every single character in Succession is totally human.

Every time you think that you’re going to finally write somebody off, the show exposes some humanness in them, some little bit of love, some little flicker of what they could have been, some attempt to do the right thing… and suddenly your heart breaks for them again.

Sure it’s loosely inspired by Lear and loosely inspired by Rupert Murdoch, and as the show creator Jesse Armstrong has noted, loosely inspired by every succession story through the ages from Shakespeare all the way to the royal succession in England.

Even though it’s inspired by all these very serious stories, as a series, the engine of Succession is actually nearly the same as a series that you probably would never equate with it.

In fact, Succession, the series, actually has the same basic structure and the same basic engine as Arrested Development!

You could even pitch Succession as the black-comic-real-world version of Arrested Development.

Like Arrested Development, the engine of Succession is a bunch of maladjusted 1% kids, who are victims of their totally narcissistic father and mother, who are struggling to do their best but don’t have the emotional means to do so even though they have all the money in the world.

The main “kid” in Arrested Development is Michael Bluth, and in Succession it’s Kendall Roy. He’s the one kid who, in each episode, is trying his best to save the family business now that the “king” (that is, the dad) is deposed.

In Succession, Logan Roy is deposed in episode 1 by a stroke. And in Arrested Development, George Bluth is deposed in episode 1 by being arrested.

And what happens in Succession, just as happens in Arrested Development, is that in each episode Kendall has got to find another way of “saving” the family.

Now, Kendall in Succession is a lot less likeable than Michael in Arrested Development.

Kendall in Succession is a recovering drug addict—which we can all respect him for—but he’s also a narcissistic asshole who’s just not that bright, who blows every meeting, who has all the wrong instincts, and who’s always focused on himself rather than the people around him.

But nevertheless, Kendall has been working his whole life to take over this company. He has a vision of what the company should be (even though he may not actually be equipped to accomplish it). 

And he’s the only person in the family who’s really taking the company seriously.

And in episode 1 of Succession, just like in episode 1 of Arrested Development, Kendall is poised to take over.

It’s been the succession planning all along, just like Michael’s succession had been planned in Arrested Development.

In the first episode of Succession, Logan decides that his son isn’t ready and instead tries to give over the power to his wife. Just like, in Arrested Development, at the end of episode 1, George gives the company that’s supposed to go to Michael to his wife, Lucille.

And just like in Arrested Development, there are reasons for this that Kendall and Michael don’t completely understand—because both companies are involved in some pretty dark dealings of which their naïve inheritor sons aren’t entirely aware.

But in both situations, the son feels screwed over by the father and trust is broken.

So the structure of each episode, the structure of the season—the way Succession works—is that in each episode Kendall comes up with some way of saving the business (sometimes at the expense of his family), and Logan and Marcia, who each have their own goals and their own intentions, will play and manipulate the children against each other until finally Kendall will compromise his own integrity trying to get what he wants.

And this is exactly the same structure of Arrested Development.


In Arrested Development, in each episode, George and Lucille will play the children against each other, until finally Michael makes a decision that compromises his own integrity and gets punished horrifically for it.

In Arrested Development, all of these machinations are played for comedy.

And in Succession we’re laughing too, but also a part of us is crying. Because in Succession all of these experiences are played with great, dramatic integrity.

What’s really interesting is that there are parallels for a lot of the other characters between Arrested Development and Succession as well.Succession we’re laughing too, but also a part of us is crying. Because in Succession all of these experiences are played with great, dramatic integrity.


We’ve already talked about the parallel between the Michael Bluth character and the Kendall Roy character, but there’s a “George Michael” character as well.

In Arrested Development, the George Michael character is Michael’s naïve son, who’s desperately in love with Maeby, his kind of twisted cousin, and who’s going to follow her around and try to please her doing all kinds of things that compromise his own values in order to get her approval.

In the structure of Succession, the George Michael character is Greg.

Greg is a young, down-on-his-luck kid, who’s related to the family even though he barely knows anybody. He’s sent by his mother, after losing his job at a theme park that’s owned by Logan Roy, to go see Logan and get a job. And Greg ends up under the tutelage of Tom.

Tom is the fiancé of Shiv Roy, who’s probably the smartest of the Roy children. She’s as close as we can get to the equivalent of the Portia de Rossi character, Lindsay, in Arrested Development.

And Tom is kind of like a mix between Tobias and their child Maeby in Arrested Development. He’s this goofy, weird guy.

(If you remember from Arrested Development Tobias is the “never-nude” and Maeby is the twisted cousin who always wants to push things a little bit, who always wants to corrupt George Michael a little bit).

And Tom ends up playing both of those roles in Succession.

Tom is both the odd mentor who is teaching Greg how to be rich, and he’s also the twisted guy who’s using and manipulating Greg in order to get his own desires met and advance his own career and feel more important in the world.

So, you’ve got Tom, who’s a Tobias/Maeby mashup, and you’ve got Greg, who’s the George Michael character—the wide-eyed innocent.


And just like in the structure of Arrested Development, those two usually form a B story in each episode. While the main story is happening, they’re off on their own doing a related story. So, you’ve got a parallel structure there as well.

And then you’ve got Connor Roy, played by Alan Ruck (who you may recognize as Cameron from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off). And Connor Roy is a little bit “off.”

His closest parallel in Arrested Development is the Buster character. He’s a slightly more real version of the Buster character. Like Buster, he isn’t totally tied to reality, and like Buster, all he wants is to please.

Buster in Arrested Development wants to please his mother and is totally under the thumb of his mother. And Connor in Succession wants to please his dad and is totally under the thumb of his dad.

Connor has tried to reinvent himself as a relaxed hippie who kind of goes with the flow, but the truth is, like Buster, he’s so insecure that he just doesn’t know how to behave in any situation.

Connor, like Buster, is in a relationship that a lot of people would frown upon.

In Buster’s case he’s dating his mother’s best friend, Lucile 2, and in Connor’s case, he’s dating a prostitute with whom he’s desperately in love—and who doesn’t love him back.

And then you’ve got Roman, who you’ve probably figured out by now is the Gob character—the trickster character.

Roman is the guy who doesn’t care about anything but himself. He’s the guy who isn’t able to see outside of the moment and who causes trouble for everyone as he pursues whatever impulse he has at any moment in the story.

And like Gob, Roman thinks of himself as a rebel, as totally independent. But he crumbles every time under the scrutiny of his father.

He’s completely afraid to stand up to his dad. He’s completely afraid to actually be himself.

And of course you’ve got Logan, who’s the George Bluth, and you’ve got Marcia, who’s the Lucille Bluth—these two complicated, scheming parents who just can’t get it right with their children.

Now, is it weird that Succession has the same structural engine as Arrested Development?

No, it isn’t weird at all.

While Arrested Development might be a ridiculous, larger-than-life comedy about the lives of the 1%, Succession is a serious dark comedy about the lives of the 1%.

But both stories are actually dealing with the same problem: what does it mean to have everything except a family that loves you?

What does it mean to have everything except a world of trust? What does it mean to have everything except the confidence that the people around you won’t screw you? And what happens when those confidences are broken? What happens when everybody is out for themselves? What happens in a purely capitalistic world?

It also shouldn’t be a big surprise because the engine of Arrested Development isn’t entirely new either.

In fact the engine of Arrested Development is stolen from Gilligan’s Island.

(I talk a lot about this in a previous podcast about Arrested Development.)

On the simplest level, here’s the engine of Gilligan’s Island:

In each episode of Gilligan’s Island, the professor comes up with a plan to get them off the island, and the whole team works together using coconuts and whatever devices they’ve figured out to try to get off the island.

But in every episode, Gilligan (the Michael/Kendall character on Gilligan’s Island) messes it up. In every episode, the Skipper freaks out. And in every episode, the Howells focus on enjoying their wealth rather than helping the team.

At the end of the day, they all get stuck on the island.

So, did Jesse Armstrong just go and rip off Arrested Development for the structure of his hit series, Succession?

Well, honestly, I don’t know.

Did Michell Hurwitz go and rip off Gilligan’s Island for the structure of his hit series, Arrested Development? Well, honestly, I don’t know that either.

There’s a great fear that happens for all screenwriters, for writers of all kinds, that their work is going to be stolen.

There’s a fear that their great idea, their Academy Award-winning idea, that one idea they have that’s going to set them free— that that idea is going to be taken from them and stolen.

And please don’t get me wrong, plagiarism is really the worst thing that you can do as an artist. Yet, at the same time, we know that all the greatest artists ever have stolen.

Shakespeare stole his plays. Hamlet is just The Ur-Hamlet. Romeo and Juliet is just Pyramus and Thisbē. In fact, Shakespeare’s rip off of Pyramus and Thisbē was so blatant that he later made fun of himself in Midsummer Night’s Dream, where he rips off Romeo and Juliet and makes a comedy out of it.

Great artists steal from everybody, but they never, ever borrow.

So, here’s the difference:

When your neighbor comes over and takes your lawn mower and uses it to mow his lawn and never gives it back, he is borrowing in the worst possible way. He isn’t taking your lawn mower to use for his own purposes: he’s taking your lawn mower to use for your purposes.

On the other hand, if your neighbor takes your lawn mower and transforms it into a helicopter, your neighbor didn’t borrow your lawn mower. He didn’t use it in the same way you did and leave it in a form that should have been returned.

Rather, he let it inspire something and he transformed those parts into something that only he could create.

As artists we want to do the same thing. We don’t want to borrow from the masters and use it to create derivative work that looks just like what they created.

We don’t want to borrow from somebody and reuse their own stuff and not transform it in our own way.

We don’t want to take the engine of Arrested Development and use it for our broad comedy series about a family.

What we want to do instead is steal it: we want to take it from them and transform it in a way where it could never be returned. We want to actually make it our own.

And this is what all the great artists have done through history: we steal from other artists, we steal from our lives.

Picasso stole from Braque and Braque stole from Picasso, and together they created Cubism.

We want to steal but we don’t want to borrow.

So, if you’re working on your own series, go take something you love and give it a huge twist not a little one.

If you’re trying to find an engine, go look for a model in something that seems as unrelated as it can be, and take that model and twist it around and let it grow back up through you.

I don’t actually know if Jesse Armstrong stole the engine of Succession on purpose, because so much of what we experience as artists is a stealing without even realizing we’re stealing.

We overhear something on the subway. We have an experience when we’re a child. We read a book that we forget about that comes back in some way.

But what we want to be doing is not creating somebody else’s characters—not dropping somebody else’s characters into our movie.

Instead, what we want to be doing, just like Jesse Armstrong is doing with Succession, is looking at all the different resources, all the different places of inspiration, bouncing all of those things up against the story that we want to tell.

We want to refine it into something so simple that we can always remember what we’re doing and then allowing our subconscious minds to let it rip, to play around, to riff around inside of that structure, letting elements that we stole and elements that we discovered mix together into a beautiful creation that only we could create.

Share this...

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Participant Agreement

By registering for the course, you are agreeing to the following terms, which form a legal contract between you and Jacob Krueger Studio, LLC (“Company”) and govern your attendance at and/or participation in Company’s course (the “Course”). 

  1. Course Participation.
    1. Admittance.  Your registration entitles you to admittance to the Course.  Any and all other costs associated with your attendance (including, without limitation, any travel or accommodation expenses) shall be borne solely by you and Company shall not be liable for any such costs.
    2. Media.  For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, you grant Company the right to record, film, photograph or capture your likeness in connection with the Course, in any media now available and hereafter developed (“Course Footage”).  You further grant to Company in perpetuity the rights to use, license, edit, copy, distribute, publicly display and make derivative works of the Course Footage, including exploitation for marketing, advertising or merchandising related to the Course, throughout the universe.  You hereby waive any and all approval rights you may have over Company’s use of the Course Footage and acknowledge these rights are granted without any payment, including royalties or residuals, to you.
    3. Conduct.  You acknowledge that Company reserves the right to request your removal from the Course if Company, in its sole discretion, considers your presence or behavior to create a disruption or to hinder the Course or the enjoyment of the Course by other attendees or speakers.
  2. Fee(s).
    • Payment.  The payment of the applicable fee(s) for the Course is due upon registration or per your payment plan.  If such payment is insufficient or declined for any reason, you acknowledge that Company has the right and sole discretion to refuse your admission to the Course.
    • Taxes. The fee(s) may be subject sales tax, value added tax, or any other taxes and duties which, if applicable, will be charged to you in addition to the fee(s).
  3. Intellectual Property. All intellectual property rights, including trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and patents, in and to the Course, the Course content and all materials distributed at or in connection with the Course (the “Course Materials”) are owned by Company. You may not use, license, copy, display, or make derivative works of the Course Materials without the prior written permission of Company.  For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this agreement shall be deemed to vest in you any legal or beneficial right in or to any trademarks or other intellectual property rights owned or used under license by Company or grant to you any right or license to any other intellectual property rights of Company, all of which shall at all times remain the exclusive property of Company.
  4. Warranties; Limitation of Liability.
    • Other than to the extent required as a matter of law: (i) neither Company nor its employees, agents or affiliates (“Company Parties”) shall be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential costs, damages or losses arising directly or indirectly from the Course or other aspect related thereto or in connection with this agreement.  The maximum aggregate liability of Company Parties for any claim in any way connected with therewith or this agreement whether in contract, tort or otherwise (including any negligent act or omission) shall be limited to the amount paid by you to Company under this agreement to attend the Course.
    • You represent and warrant that you have the full right and authority to grant Company the rights provided in this agreement and that you have made no commitments which conflict with this agreement or the rights granted herein.  You agree that your participation in the Course is entirely at your own risk and accept full responsibility for your decision to participate in the Course.  In no event shall you have the right to enjoin the development, production, exploitation or use of the Course and/or your Contributions to it. 
  5. Governing Law and Venue.  This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws provisions.  The parties hereto agree to submit to personal and subject matter jurisdiction in the federal or state courts located in the City and State of New York, United States of America.
  6. Dispute Resolution.  All claims and disputes arising under or relating to this agreement are to be settled by binding arbitration in the state of New York or another location mutually agreeable to the parties.  The arbitration shall be conducted on a confidential basis pursuant to the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.  Any decision or award as a result of any such arbitration proceeding shall be in writing and shall provide an explanation for all conclusions of law and fact and shall include the assessment of costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys’ fees by the winner against the loser.  Any such arbitration shall include a written record of the arbitration hearing.  An award of arbitration may be confirmed in a court of competent jurisdiction.
  7. Miscellaneous.  Company may transfer and assign this agreement or all or any of its rights or privileges hereunder to any entity or individual without restriction.  This agreement shall be binding on all of your successors-in-interest, heirs and assigns.  This agreement sets forth the entire agreement between you and the Company in relation to the Course, and you acknowledge that in entering into it, you are not relying upon any promises or statements made by anyone about the nature of the Course or your Contributions or the identity of any other participants or persons involved with the Course.  This agreement may not be altered or amended except in writing signed by both parties.
  8. Prevention of “Zoom-Bomber” Disruptions; Unauthorized Publication of Class Videos. Company will record each class session, including your participation in the session, entitled “The Videos”. To prevent disruptions by “zoom-bombers” and provide Company and

    participants the legal standing to remove unauthorized content from platforms such as YouTube and social media sites, you agree that

    (1) you are prohibited from recording any portion of the Course;

    (2) in exchange for the opportunity to participate in the Course, you assign to Company your verbal contributions to the session discussions.

    To be clear, you assign to Company only your oral statements during recorded Course sessions. You retain all copyright to any and all written materials you submit to the class and the right to use them in any way you choose without permission from or compensation to the Company.

Welcom Back!

Log in to access your account

Our website uses cookies to provide a better user experience. By using our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more about cookies and how you can refuse them.

We will see you this Thursday!

7pm ET / 4pm PT

Check Your Email For The Link

(Don’t see it? Check your spam folder)

Donate To Our Scholarship Fund

We match every donation we receive dollar for dollar, and use the funds to offset the cost of our programs for students who otherwise could not afford to attend.

We have given away over 140,000 of scholarships in the past year.

Thank you for your support!

Other Amount? CONTACT US

Get Your Video Seminar


Where should we send it?

"*" indicates required fields

Would You Like More Information About Our Classes?
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Need A Payment Plan?

We like working with artists and strive not to leave writers behind over money.

If you need a payment plan or another arrangement to participate in our programs, we are happy to help.

Chat us or give us a call at 917-464-3594 and we will figure out a plan that fits your budget.

Join the waitlist!

Fill in the form below to be placed on the waitlist. We'll let you know once a slot opens up!